Barrett and others v Morgan
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1998] 50 EG 87-93(7)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: CA 30 June 1998. Plaintiffs appealed from a decision dismissing their claim for possession of land. B were freeholders of agricultural land which was subject to a subtenancy held by M. In order to sell the land, B issued a notice to quit, the tenants refrained to serve a counternotice, so on expiry of the notice to quit the head tenancy, B believed the tenancy and subtenancy would end. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the termination of a headlease does not destroy any subtenancies. Held.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X95732 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 90368-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 30 June 1998. Plaintiffs appealed from a decision dismissing their claim for possession of land. B were freeholders of agricultural land which was subject to a subtenancy held by M. In order to sell the land, B issued a notice to quit, the tenants refrained to serve a counternotice, so on expiry of the notice to quit the head tenancy, B believed the tenancy and subtenancy would end. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the termination of a headlease does not destroy any subtenancies. Held.