Image from Google Jackets

Nynehead Developments Ltd v RH Fibreboard Containers Ltd and others

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [1999] 02 EG 139-146(8)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: ChD 19 October 1998. In September 1982, the plaintiff landlord (N) granted the first defendant tenant (R) a 23-year lease on commercial premises consisting of three units. This granted rights to use a shared forecourt and an exclusive right to park vehicles on part of the forecourt for loading and unloading; and contained a covenant for quiet enjoyment on the part of the landlord. In 1993 and 1995 two further units were let to F and C on the same terms. F and C, in breach of their covenants, continually parked their vehicles on the forecourt, causing annoyance to R. N and R entered into correspondence regarding this, but no satisfactory conclusion was reached. In July 1996 R vacated the premises and in June 1997 withheld rent due to N. N issued proceedings claiming arrears of rent, the defendants contended that the landlord was in repudiatory breach, in authorising and encouraging the commission of a serious nuisance."Held" the claim for rent allowed and the counterclaim dismissed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS60000 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 90751-1001

ChD 19 October 1998. In September 1982, the plaintiff landlord (N) granted the first defendant tenant (R) a 23-year lease on commercial premises consisting of three units. This granted rights to use a shared forecourt and an exclusive right to park vehicles on part of the forecourt for loading and unloading; and contained a covenant for quiet enjoyment on the part of the landlord. In 1993 and 1995 two further units were let to F and C on the same terms. F and C, in breach of their covenants, continually parked their vehicles on the forecourt, causing annoyance to R. N and R entered into correspondence regarding this, but no satisfactory conclusion was reached. In July 1996 R vacated the premises and in June 1997 withheld rent due to N. N issued proceedings claiming arrears of rent, the defendants contended that the landlord was in repudiatory breach, in authorising and encouraging the commission of a serious nuisance."Held" the claim for rent allowed and the counterclaim dismissed.