Expert witnesses on trial
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 397(6209) 20 January 1999, 25(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the case of "London Underground v Kenchington Ford" in which expert evidence was condemned as invalid and unscientific, arguing that in future clients and legal teams will need to be particularly vigilant in case management to ensure that experts meet high standards of objectivity, independence and fairness.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS59884 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 90815-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the case of "London Underground v Kenchington Ford" in which expert evidence was condemned as invalid and unscientific, arguing that in future clients and legal teams will need to be particularly vigilant in case management to ensure that experts meet high standards of objectivity, independence and fairness.