Agricultural buildings
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1999] EGCS 5 (30/01/99)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: "Farmer (VO) v Hambleton DC and another" CA 14 January 1999. Hereditament used for supply of feed to farms. It was occupied by a body corporate but also supplied to non-member companies. At issue was whether the hereditament was an agricultural building and needed to be rated. Valuation Tribunal deleted entry from rating list. VO appealed. LT found insufficient evidence to conclude building was for agricultural use. Body corporate appealed. Appeal allowed and entry on ratings list deleted.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3505-34 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 91075-1001 |
"Farmer (VO) v Hambleton DC and another" CA 14 January 1999. Hereditament used for supply of feed to farms. It was occupied by a body corporate but also supplied to non-member companies. At issue was whether the hereditament was an agricultural building and needed to be rated. Valuation Tribunal deleted entry from rating list. VO appealed. LT found insufficient evidence to conclude building was for agricultural use. Body corporate appealed. Appeal allowed and entry on ratings list deleted.