Beware hidden interests
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9905) 6 February 1999, 159(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the implications of the case "Ferrishurst v Wallcite", in which the CA judged that with regard to the Land Registration Act 1925 s70(i)(g), occupation of part of the property affected by rights of the occupier is sufficient; and that the capacity in which the person occupies need not indicate the nature of the right claimed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS60033 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 91151-1001 |
Discusses the implications of the case "Ferrishurst v Wallcite", in which the CA judged that with regard to the Land Registration Act 1925 s70(i)(g), occupation of part of the property affected by rights of the occupier is sufficient; and that the capacity in which the person occupies need not indicate the nature of the right claimed.