Negligence defence queried
Language: English Series: CSW - The Property Week ; 44(7/8) 12/19 August 1993, 12(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: Considers the implications of "HIT Finance v Lewis & Tucker" where the defendant`s claim that the lender should have investigated the borrower`s means of repayment more thoroughly was dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2930-62 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 91247-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the implications of "HIT Finance v Lewis & Tucker" where the defendant`s claim that the lender should have investigated the borrower`s means of repayment more thoroughly was dismissed.