The Royal Brompton National Health Trust v Frederick Alexander Hammon & others
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; [1999] CILL, 1464-1467(4)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Technology & Construction Court 8 January 1999. Biggin v Permanite reviewed. Was a claim that the magnitude of the number of instructions issued to the contractor causing loss and expense necessarily bad in principle? How widely should the principle in "Biggin v Permanite" be interpreted and applied?| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X96829 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 91495-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Technology & Construction Court 8 January 1999. Biggin v Permanite reviewed. Was a claim that the magnitude of the number of instructions issued to the contractor causing loss and expense necessarily bad in principle? How widely should the principle in "Biggin v Permanite" be interpreted and applied?