Meaning of curtilage
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 119Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In James v SOS for the Environment and another QBD 9 October 1990, it was held that an inspector was correct in not allowing the appellant to retain a tennis court built without planning permission as the tennis court did not constitute permitted development within the curtilage of a dwelling house . Application by owner dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2643-39 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 9384-1001 |
In James v SOS for the Environment and another QBD 9 October 1990, it was held that an inspector was correct in not allowing the appellant to retain a tennis court built without planning permission as the tennis court did not constitute permitted development within the curtilage of a dwelling house . Application by owner dismissed.