Divided by a wall
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9919) 15 May 1999, 160(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the issue of adverse possession with regard to the case Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Waterloo Real Estate Inc, in which both parties claimed title to a wall which had become key to the redevelopment of both properties. Concludes that adverse possession requires exclusive possession and a demonstrable intention to exclude everyone, and that the test of such intention is the same whether or not the squatter is a conscious trespasser.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3519-35 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 93443-1001 |
Discusses the issue of adverse possession with regard to the case Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Waterloo Real Estate Inc, in which both parties claimed title to a wall which had become key to the redevelopment of both properties. Concludes that adverse possession requires exclusive possession and a demonstrable intention to exclude everyone, and that the test of such intention is the same whether or not the squatter is a conscious trespasser.