Image from Google Jackets

Licence or tenancy

Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 89Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: Bostock v Bryant and another CA 27 June 1990. The appellant`s claim that the occupiers, who shared the house with the owner and paid for gas and electricity, were licensees was allowed. Payment for gas and electricity did not constitute 2/3 of the rateable value of the house and therefore did not count as rent.

Bostock v Bryant and another CA 27 June 1990. The appellant`s claim that the occupiers, who shared the house with the owner and paid for gas and electricity, were licensees was allowed. Payment for gas and electricity did not constitute 2/3 of the rateable value of the house and therefore did not count as rent.