VAT and business purposes
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 102(1) (17/6/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Haringey LBC v Customs & Excise Commissioners" QBD 22 May 1995. The council had a statutory duty to maintain Alexandra Palace and had the property reconstructed after a fire. Part of the property was used for business purposes. The calculation of VAT on supplies for the rebuilding took into account the portion of time the building was used for business and an appeal against this by the Commissioners was unsuccessful.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3124-50 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 9546-1001 |
"Haringey LBC v Customs & Excise Commissioners" QBD 22 May 1995. The council had a statutory duty to maintain Alexandra Palace and had the property reconstructed after a fire. Part of the property was used for business purposes. The calculation of VAT on supplies for the rebuilding took into account the portion of time the building was used for business and an appeal against this by the Commissioners was unsuccessful.