Misrepresentation in auction details
Language: English Series: Times ; 13/3/90 p41Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd ChD 27 February 1990. Misrepresentation of particulars concerning rent reviews of properties for auction caused the plaintiffs to make a contract to buy, which they rescinded on discovering the true arrangements. The court found this action to be fair and upheld the claim for the return of the deposit on the properties.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2611-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 9594-1001 |
Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd ChD 27 February 1990. Misrepresentation of particulars concerning rent reviews of properties for auction caused the plaintiffs to make a contract to buy, which they rescinded on discovering the true arrangements. The court found this action to be fair and upheld the claim for the return of the deposit on the properties.