The trouble with set-off
Series: Building ; 264(8106) 1 October 1999, 56-57(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Examines the practice of set-off by construction firms which is the cause of the majority of the construction industry's payment disputes. Looks at the decisions in "Rosehaugh Stanhope v Redpath Dorman Long Ltd", and "Gilbert-Ash v Modern Engineering Ltd". States that adjudication is the most effective solution to set-off abuse.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS61316 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101130-1001 |
Examines the practice of set-off by construction firms which is the cause of the majority of the construction industry's payment disputes. Looks at the decisions in "Rosehaugh Stanhope v Redpath Dorman Long Ltd", and "Gilbert-Ash v Modern Engineering Ltd". States that adjudication is the most effective solution to set-off abuse.