It's a score draw now
Series: Building ; (41) 15 October 1999, 65(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s):- MACOB CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD
- PROJECT CONSULTANCY GROUP V TRUSTEES OF THE GRAY TRUST
- PROCEDURE
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- DISPUTES
- JURISDICTION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS61305 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101181-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Macob Civil Engineering v Morrison Construction Ltd" the decision showed that an adjudicatorαs ruling was enforceable, even if there had been a procedural error. Discusses a new case, "Project Consultancy Group v Trustees of the Gray Trust'" that shows the court drew a distinction between a decision that was invalid because of alleged procedural error, and a decision that was not within the jurisdiction of the adjudicator to make under the relevant act.