The high cost of tainted advice.
Series: Property Week ; 64(27) 9 July 1999, 32-33(2)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Examines the implications of the case Urban Regeneration Agency (English Partnerships) v Mott MacDonald Group Ltd and others, where the defendants were found to have fallen short of a reasonable standard in acting as an environmental consultant on a reclamation and redevelopment scheme. Emphasises the importance of clarity when instructions are given to such consultants, and the need for consultants to be clear when giving advice and reporting findings.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS60955 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101501-1001 |
Examines the implications of the case Urban Regeneration Agency (English Partnerships) v Mott MacDonald Group Ltd and others, where the defendants were found to have fallen short of a reasonable standard in acting as an environmental consultant on a reclamation and redevelopment scheme. Emphasises the importance of clarity when instructions are given to such consultants, and the need for consultants to be clear when giving advice and reporting findings.