When statute meets equity.
Series: Property Week ; 64(30) 30 July 1999, 38(1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Examines the CA decision in Yaxley v Gotts, the first case to test whether the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2 negates an oral conveyancing agreement that would otherwise be valid under proprietary estoppel.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS61023 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101577-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines the CA decision in Yaxley v Gotts, the first case to test whether the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2 negates an oral conveyancing agreement that would otherwise be valid under proprietary estoppel.