Casey v Canterbury CC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; 1995 RVR 228-229(2)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: LT 17 November 1995. Claim for compensation in respect of tree preservation orders. LT ruled it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant`s claim for damages as there was no statutory right to be compensated for the making of a tree preservation order.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54305 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 9695-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 17 November 1995. Claim for compensation in respect of tree preservation orders. LT ruled it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant`s claim for damages as there was no statutory right to be compensated for the making of a tree preservation order.