Re Palmiero: debtor 3666 of 1999
Series: Estates Gazette ; [1999] 38 EG 195-196(2)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: ChD 28 July 1999. The petitioning landlord peaceably re-entered business premises, demised to the debtor, in reliance on a forfeiture clause in the lease. In connection with a bankruptcy petition, the debtor tenant contended that he had a right to remove tenant's fixtures that he claimed had a value of over £19 000. "Held", the tenant had no right to remove tenant's fixtures. The decision in Pugh v Arton (1869, LR 8Eq 626) was binding. Accordingly the tenant had no counterclaim based on the landlord's refusal to allow him to remove the fixtures.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS61235 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101839-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 28 July 1999. The petitioning landlord peaceably re-entered business premises, demised to the debtor, in reliance on a forfeiture clause in the lease. In connection with a bankruptcy petition, the debtor tenant contended that he had a right to remove tenant's fixtures that he claimed had a value of over £19 000. "Held", the tenant had no right to remove tenant's fixtures. The decision in Pugh v Arton (1869, LR 8Eq 626) was binding. Accordingly the tenant had no counterclaim based on the landlord's refusal to allow him to remove the fixtures.