Starling v Lloyds TSB Bank
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] 01 EG 89-93(5)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: CA 29 August 1999. In 1980 claimant (S) granted defendant bank (L) a legal charge of a residential property to secure a loan. By express terms of legal charge, mortgagor was not allowed to lease the property and S was required to obtai consent of bank before letting. In 1991 S sought L's permission to let the property. Request was dismissed. S then commenced proceedings against L alleging a breach of certain pleaded duties of the bank. Court found banck in breach of duty. L appealed. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS61797 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 103726-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 29 August 1999. In 1980 claimant (S) granted defendant bank (L) a legal charge of a residential property to secure a loan. By express terms of legal charge, mortgagor was not allowed to lease the property and S was required to obtai consent of bank before letting. In 1991 S sought L's permission to let the property. Request was dismissed. S then commenced proceedings against L alleging a breach of certain pleaded duties of the bank. Court found banck in breach of duty. L appealed. Appeal allowed.