Environmental impact assessment
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] EGCS 39 (25/03/2000)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: "R v Durham CC and others, ex parte Huddlestone", CA 8 March 2000. Respondent attempted to register a dormant planning permission to extract minerals on a large site. Council informed respondent that an environmental impact assessment (EIA) would be required as part of the process. The EIA was not submitted and planning permission was granted. Applicant who lived near the site challenged determination claiming it should be quashed as it was not accompanied by the EIA. "Held" appeal allowed - the application succeeded to the extent that the council and the respondent were to treat the statutory deeming provision as ineffective.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3613-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 105061-1001 |
"R v Durham CC and others, ex parte Huddlestone", CA 8 March 2000. Respondent attempted to register a dormant planning permission to extract minerals on a large site. Council informed respondent that an environmental impact assessment (EIA) would be required as part of the process. The EIA was not submitted and planning permission was granted. Applicant who lived near the site challenged determination claiming it should be quashed as it was not accompanied by the EIA. "Held" appeal allowed - the application succeeded to the extent that the council and the respondent were to treat the statutory deeming provision as ineffective.