Palmer and another v Bowman and another
Series: Weekly Law Reports ; [2000] 1 WLR 842-856(18)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: CA 14 January 1999. Plaintiff P and defendant B were neighbouring landowners. Naturally occurring water had previously drained from P's land to B's land via drainage ditches which belonged to B but had gradually disappeared over the previous 30 years. P claimed entitlement to easement of drainage. . P appealed against ruling that the easement had been extinguished by abandonment. B cross appealed on the grounds that B was not entitled to the easement. Appeal dismissed and cross appeal allowed. Held that right to drainage was not capable of being established as an easement.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62268 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106009-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 14 January 1999. Plaintiff P and defendant B were neighbouring landowners. Naturally occurring water had previously drained from P's land to B's land via drainage ditches which belonged to B but had gradually disappeared over the previous 30 years. P claimed entitlement to easement of drainage. . P appealed against ruling that the easement had been extinguished by abandonment. B cross appealed on the grounds that B was not entitled to the easement. Appeal dismissed and cross appeal allowed. Held that right to drainage was not capable of being established as an easement.