Ruling may spell end of adjudication process
Series: Contract Journal ; 28 June 2000, 3(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: In a case brought by subcontractors seeking recovery of monies they claimed they were due, the court upheld a contract clause, dictating that the party referring a dispute to adjudication would have to pay both sides' costs irrespective of its eventual findings. The subcontract incorporated the model CIC adjudication procedures but with amended terms as to costs.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | WB3625-10 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106885-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In a case brought by subcontractors seeking recovery of monies they claimed they were due, the court upheld a contract clause, dictating that the party referring a dispute to adjudication would have to pay both sides' costs irrespective of its eventual findings. The subcontract incorporated the model CIC adjudication procedures but with amended terms as to costs.