Tenancy minefield

By:

Beasley, A

Contributor(s):

Dunn, G

Series: Property Week ; 65(26) 30 June 2000, 66-67(2)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):

Summary: Considers a recent House of Lords decision in an agricultural periodic tenancy case "Barrett v Morgan" which has implications for commercial property transactions when companies undertake sale-and-leasebacks. The case establishes legal principles which can be applied to fixed-term tenancies subject to break options.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS62629 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	107186-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS62625 Treasure islands	ABS62626 Commonhold: common sense at last?	ABS62628 After 46 years it's time for a change	ABS62629 Tenancy minefield	ABS62630 Grounds of opposition	ABS62631 Dot.com deals: what do we do with high-tech tenants?	ABS62632 Flexible friends	Next

Considers a recent House of Lords decision in an agricultural periodic tenancy case "Barrett v Morgan" which has implications for commercial property transactions when companies undertake sale-and-leasebacks. The case establishes legal principles which can be applied to fixed-term tenancies subject to break options.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)