Can you sue the referee?
Series: Building ; (27) 7 July 2000, 71(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
- TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION BAR ASSOCIATION
- MOWLEM
- HYDRA TIGHT
- JURISDICTION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS62602 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 107603-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Looks at jurisdiction in adjudication proceedings in the light of the dispute between Mowlem and Hydra-Tight. Mowlem in its subcontract insists it has the right to choose a barrister. Hydra-Tight disagreed and called in the ICE to appoint. Mowlem argued that if the referee continued to adjudicate, thenhe had no right to adjudicate, and that the company would sue him for costs. As an alternative, the author suggests that Mowlem could have approached the Technology and Construction Bar Association.