Image from Google Jackets

Designed out of the picture

By: Contributor(s): Series: Building ; 265(8149) 11 August 2000, 53(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the case of "Co-operative Retail Services v Taylor Young Partnership" which upheld the original intent behind the JCT insurance provisions. The decision that the JCT Contract provided a code to ensure fire damage should be reinstated and the consequences of delay apportioned could cause a major transfer of risk from joint names to professional indemnity insurers.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS62680 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 107933-1001

Discusses the case of "Co-operative Retail Services v Taylor Young Partnership" which upheld the original intent behind the JCT insurance provisions. The decision that the JCT Contract provided a code to ensure fire damage should be reinstated and the consequences of delay apportioned could cause a major transfer of risk from joint names to professional indemnity insurers.