Insolvent abuse

By:

Bingham, T

Series: Building ; 265(8150) 18 August 2000, 49(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):

Summary: Discusses the decision in "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" which upheld the adjudicator's 'wrong' decision. Questions why the court did not use liquidation law to protect Bouygues.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS62727 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	108005-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS62724 The cost of adjudication	ABS62725 Adjudication: all change	ABS62726 A fishy business	ABS62727 Insolvent abuse	ABS62728 Crazy mixed-up contracts	ABS62729 The adjudication system under the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998	ABS62730 The enforcement of adjudicators' awards under the Housing, Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996: Part 2.	Next

Discusses the decision in "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" which upheld the adjudicator's 'wrong' decision. Questions why the court did not use liquidation law to protect Bouygues.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)