Replacing lost cash: can it really be done?
Series: Farmers' Weekly ; 133(6) 1 September 2000, 68-69(2)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Considers whether MAFF's decision to shift subsidies from production to the environment can ever make up for the lower prices caused by 2.5% modulation. Looks at the Countryside Stewardship Scheme and Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Case studies.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS62925 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108371-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers whether MAFF's decision to shift subsidies from production to the environment can ever make up for the lower prices caused by 2.5% modulation. Looks at the Countryside Stewardship Scheme and Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Case studies.