Whose loss is it anyway?
Series: Building ; 265(8151) 1 September 2000, 64(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the HL decision in "Alfred McAlpine v Panatown" which held that a company that hasn't suffered direct loss from defective work can't sue for damages under the provisions of common law. The dispute is one of the longest running in construction history.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS62859 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108384-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ABS62856 Property UK: West End | ABS62857 Focus 2000: M25 South West | ABS62858 Hard sell | ABS62859 Whose loss is it anyway? | ABS62860 Talking it over | ABS62861 Out of bounds | ABS62862 The price of freedom |
Discusses the HL decision in "Alfred McAlpine v Panatown" which held that a company that hasn't suffered direct loss from defective work can't sue for damages under the provisions of common law. The dispute is one of the longest running in construction history.