Compromising position

By:

Pemble, S

Series: Estates Gazette ; (0035) 2 September 2000, 130(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):

Summary: Discusses the decision in "Pitchmastic plc v Birse Construction Ltd (No 2)" which shows that settlement offers made outside of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) can still be relevant.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS62820 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	108439-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS62817 Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd	ABS62818 Recovery by formulae of head office overheads: a case for re-engineering	ABS62819 How to avoid being a guinea-pig for changes	ABS62820 Compromising position	ABS62821 A fast case of the blues	ABS62822 Retentions do us no favours	ABS62823 Construction in the Middle East	Next

Discusses the decision in "Pitchmastic plc v Birse Construction Ltd (No 2)" which shows that settlement offers made outside of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) can still be relevant.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)