With all proper reserve
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0041) 14 October 2000, 208(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Barry v Heathcote Ball & Co (Commercial Auctions) Ltd" and the subsequent CA ruling which affirms that a 'without reserve' clause must be upheld. Also highlights that an auctioneer who refuses to sell is liable for the bidder's lost sale.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3641-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108865-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses "Barry v Heathcote Ball & Co (Commercial Auctions) Ltd" and the subsequent CA ruling which affirms that a 'without reserve' clause must be upheld. Also highlights that an auctioneer who refuses to sell is liable for the bidder's lost sale.