A natural reaction
Series: Building ; 265(8156) 6 October 2000, 88(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):- DISCAIN PROJECT SERVICES LTD V OPECPRIME DEVELOPMENT LTD
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- NATURAL JUSTICE
- MACOB CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD
- BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63003 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108885-1001 |
Considers the debate over the issue of the extent to which an adjudicator must act judicially and comply with the rules of natural justice. Looks at the decision in "Discain Project Services Limited v Opecprime Development Ltd", which will be welcomed by critics of this new form of dispute resolution. Judge Bowscher identified two types of breach of natural justice: procedural errors, which have no demonstrable effect on the outcome of the adjudication; and more significant breaches of the rules of natural justice that can obviously influence the decision.