Not so limited liability
Series: Estates Gazette ; 0042(21) 21 October 2000, 172(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the distinction between repair and condition as written in tenancy agreements. The recent ruling in "Welsh v Greenwich LBC" shows that a landlord's obligation to keep premises in 'good condition' can impose a more extensive liability than one to keep in 'repair', when cited in a short form of tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3642-23 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108986-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3642-20 High-tech utopia fails | WB3642-21 Library not required | WB3642-22 Share crash fear | WB3642-23 Not so limited liability | WB3642-24 Sustainable aggregates supply | WB3642-25 Town and country planning | WB3642-26 Town and country planning |
Discusses the distinction between repair and condition as written in tenancy agreements. The recent ruling in "Welsh v Greenwich LBC" shows that a landlord's obligation to keep premises in 'good condition' can impose a more extensive liability than one to keep in 'repair', when cited in a short form of tenancy.