Lease
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2000] EGCS 118 (4/11/00)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: "Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O'Higgins". CA 20 October 2000. Defendant moved into premises owned by the claimant landlord. The company owned by defendant was named as tenant for tax purposes. On expiry of lease the landlord issued proceedings for possession. Question whether defendant was statutory tenant and whether the lease was a sham. The defendant appealed. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3644-24 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 109275-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3644-20 Rent reforms 'defy logic' | WB3644-22 Deemed insufficient | WB3644-23 Statutory tenancy | WB3644-24 Lease | WB3644-25 Lawyers face threat from supermarkets | WB3644-26 Retail development | WB3644-27 Planning permission - change of land use |
"Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O'Higgins". CA 20 October 2000. Defendant moved into premises owned by the claimant landlord. The company owned by defendant was named as tenant for tax purposes. On expiry of lease the landlord issued proceedings for possession. Question whether defendant was statutory tenant and whether the lease was a sham. The defendant appealed. Appeal dismissed.