Check out the policy
Series: Building ; 265(8160) 3 November 2000, 63(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Looks at the confusion caused by unclear insurance clauses in building contracts. Gives the example of fire damage to embassy buildings in Belgravia, on which government insurers had to pay out for rather than the subcontractors on site. Also examines the recent case of "Casson v Ostley" where the contract clause prevented the claimant receiving damages for a fire caused by the contractor's negligence.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63096 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 109345-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Looks at the confusion caused by unclear insurance clauses in building contracts. Gives the example of fire damage to embassy buildings in Belgravia, on which government insurers had to pay out for rather than the subcontractors on site. Also examines the recent case of "Casson v Ostley" where the contract clause prevented the claimant receiving damages for a fire caused by the contractor's negligence.