Conditional discharge
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0045) 11 November 2000, 174(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: With reference to the CA decision in "Jolley v Carmel Ltd", discusses how previous decisions on the construction of commercial contracts cannot be seen as setting binding precedents, and that when parties do not choose certainty, the court can interpret this as a wish for flexibility.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3645-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 109362-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
With reference to the CA decision in "Jolley v Carmel Ltd", discusses how previous decisions on the construction of commercial contracts cannot be seen as setting binding precedents, and that when parties do not choose certainty, the court can interpret this as a wish for flexibility.