Valuation cannot be overturned
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1994) EGCS 125 (16/7/94)Publication details: 1994) EGCS 125 (16/7/94)Subject(s):- ACCESS
- BATCHELOR V KENT CC
- COMPENSATION
- Compulsory purchase
- LANDS TRIBUNAL
- NO-SCHEME WORLD
- POINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
- POINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
- STOKES V CAMBRIDGE CORPORATION
- Valuation
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
- RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3028-12 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10388-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Ward Construction (Medway) Ltd v Barclays Bank plc and another"; "Barclays Bank plc v Kent CC" CA 1 July 1994. Although the valuation for compensation for the compulsory purchase of land for highway improvements for a residential development was high, there was no error in law to allow interference with the decision. The Pointe Gourde principle had been correctly applied and as for the Stokes `principle`, the use of this as a principle of valuation not law, was for the LT to decide.