Image from Google Jackets

Ask yourself this

By: Series: Building ; 266(8166) 26 January 2001, 61(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Karl Construction (Scotland) Ltd v Sweeney Civil Engineering Ltd" (2000) where the adjudicator did not ask the parties to address her on one of two key points in the case. Although a judge subsequently refused to set this decision aside, as there is no means for correcting a procedural error as in arbitration or litigation, the case serves to emphasise the rough and ready nature of the process.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS63421 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 110799-1001

Discusses "Karl Construction (Scotland) Ltd v Sweeney Civil Engineering Ltd" (2000) where the adjudicator did not ask the parties to address her on one of two key points in the case. Although a judge subsequently refused to set this decision aside, as there is no means for correcting a procedural error as in arbitration or litigation, the case serves to emphasise the rough and ready nature of the process.