Simply a question of 'right' interpretation
Series: Contract Journal ; 407(6315) 21 February 2001, 33(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- PALMERS LTD V A B B POWER CONSTRUCTION LTD
- HOMER BURGESS LTD V CHIREX (ANNAN) LTD
- A B B POWER CONSTRUCTION LTD V NORWEST HOLST ENGINEERING LTD
- A B B ZANTINGH LTD V ZEDAL BUILDING SERVICES LTD
- CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
- INTERPRETATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | X111139 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111139-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines various cases to determine which construction operations are exempt under the Construction Act 1996 s105(1). Concludes that when deciding if an activity is excluded by s105(1), both the activity and the whole site has to be included in the excluded definitions.