Image from Google Jackets

A case in point...

By: Series: Cost Engineer ; 39(1) February 2001, 13(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Interprets two recent cases which hold importance for project practitioners: "Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown Ltd" (2000) and "Panatown Ltd v Alfred McAlpine" (2000). The first case involved E taking a lease of a public house from I. The lease contained a clause that constituted the entire agreement between the parties. The outcome being that an 'entire agreement' clause invalidates a warranty. The second case illustrates the problem project managers face attempting to decide which company should be named upon the Contract Form as the Employer under the contract. One point raised in the outcome of the case is that Third Party Warranties are useful.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS63594 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 111222-1001

Interprets two recent cases which hold importance for project practitioners: "Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown Ltd" (2000) and "Panatown Ltd v Alfred McAlpine" (2000). The first case involved E taking a lease of a public house from I. The lease contained a clause that constituted the entire agreement between the parties. The outcome being that an 'entire agreement' clause invalidates a warranty. The second case illustrates the problem project managers face attempting to decide which company should be named upon the Contract Form as the Employer under the contract. One point raised in the outcome of the case is that Third Party Warranties are useful.