Greenbank v Pickles
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 09 EG 230-236(7)Publication details: Subject(s): Summary: CA 20 October 2000. A held an agricultural tenancy, granted by the respondent (B) in 1980 for a 10 year term. In earlier proceedings it was held the parties had been partners. By a CC order in July 1993, the partnership was declared dissolved. The tenancy was assigned to B who was ordered to make a 10% payment of its value to A. The CC Judge determined the value of the tenancy. A appealed on the grounds that the valuer's evidence was illogical. Appeal allowed. The judge ruled that the same principles as those accepted in Walton's Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners applied.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS63727 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111417-1001 |
CA 20 October 2000. A held an agricultural tenancy, granted by the respondent (B) in 1980 for a 10 year term. In earlier proceedings it was held the parties had been partners. By a CC order in July 1993, the partnership was declared dissolved. The tenancy was assigned to B who was ordered to make a 10% payment of its value to A. The CC Judge determined the value of the tenancy. A appealed on the grounds that the valuer's evidence was illogical. Appeal allowed. The judge ruled that the same principles as those accepted in Walton's Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners applied.