Occupational hazards
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0110) 10 March 2001, 154(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Darby v National Trust" a CA case, which held that an occupier does not need to warn visitors against dangers that are obvious and that failure to warn against one danger does not create liability for another.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3711-32 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111446-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3711-29 Surveyors ahead in earnings game | WB3711-30 CBRE launches Euro team | WB3711-31 Top city firms unite | WB3711-32 Occupational hazards | WB3711-33 MoD property arm | WB3711-34 Share farming | WB3711-35 Targets for regional agencies |
Discusses "Darby v National Trust" a CA case, which held that an occupier does not need to warn visitors against dangers that are obvious and that failure to warn against one danger does not create liability for another.