An alternative view of the planning appeals process
Series: New Law Journal ; 151(6977) 30 March 2001, 463-464(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Presents a number of arguments that suggest the High Court's judgment in the "Alconbury" case (see: ABS63468) rests on an unnecessarily conservative reading of the Human Rights Act. Questions whether the High Court should extend its jurisdiction per the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288. Also looks at Article 1 of the First Protocol.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63754 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111774-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Presents a number of arguments that suggest the High Court's judgment in the "Alconbury" case (see: ABS63468) rests on an unnecessarily conservative reading of the Human Rights Act. Questions whether the High Court should extend its jurisdiction per the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288. Also looks at Article 1 of the First Protocol.