Spoilt for choice?
Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 145(18) 11 May 2001, 436(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Considers the dispute resolution options available for landlord and tenant disputes. Dispels the notion that experts/arbitrators gain substantial fees through dispute resolution, highlighting that experts on the RICS panel rarely receive appointments which result in a determination and a fee. Outlines the advantages of the PACT (Professional Arbitration on Court Terms) dispute resolution scheme, which include speed, lower cost, high quality decisions, and flexibility. Suggests that expert nomination is preferable to arbitration in rental disputes, and concludes with a brief summary of the mediation option.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63978 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 112676-1001 |
Considers the dispute resolution options available for landlord and tenant disputes. Dispels the notion that experts/arbitrators gain substantial fees through dispute resolution, highlighting that experts on the RICS panel rarely receive appointments which result in a determination and a fee. Outlines the advantages of the PACT (Professional Arbitration on Court Terms) dispute resolution scheme, which include speed, lower cost, high quality decisions, and flexibility. Suggests that expert nomination is preferable to arbitration in rental disputes, and concludes with a brief summary of the mediation option.