Devised to deprive
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0120) 19 May 2001, 226(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Considers the ruling by CA in "Bankway Properties Ltd v Dunsford" that a clause in an assured tenancy agreement that seeks to increase the rent to an unattainable sum is ineffective on the grounds that it is intended to evade the operation of a statute which it is not permissible to contract out of.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3720-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 112708-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the ruling by CA in "Bankway Properties Ltd v Dunsford" that a clause in an assured tenancy agreement that seeks to increase the rent to an unattainable sum is ineffective on the grounds that it is intended to evade the operation of a statute which it is not permissible to contract out of.