A question over pay as you go
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0117) 28 April 2001, 216-217(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Recent case law illustrates how landlords and tenants must give considerable thought to dilapidation claims at the termination of a lease. Discusses the cases of "Craven (Building) Ltd v SoS Health" and "Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd" which raise the following key points: diminution in value is linked to the real market for the premises; a landlord's intentions at the termination of the lease must be determined; the needs of a hypothetical buyer and transaction have to be considered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64007 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 112915-1001 |
Recent case law illustrates how landlords and tenants must give considerable thought to dilapidation claims at the termination of a lease. Discusses the cases of "Craven (Building) Ltd v SoS Health" and "Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd" which raise the following key points: diminution in value is linked to the real market for the premises; a landlord's intentions at the termination of the lease must be determined; the needs of a hypothetical buyer and transaction have to be considered.