Duties of care for latent damage in building cases
Series: New Law Journal ; 151(6985) 754-755(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- ANNS AND OTHERS V MERTON LBC
- BAXALL SECURITIES LTD AND ANOTHER V SHEARD WALSHAW PARTNERSHIP
- BELLEFIELD COMPUTER SERVICES LTD AND OTHERS V E TURNER AND SONS
- BUILDERS
- CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONALS
- CONSULTANTS
- CONSULTANTS LIABILITIES
- DEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT 1972
- HEDLEY BRYNE & CO V HELLER & PARTNERS LTD
- LATENT DAMAGE
- LATENT DAMAGE ACT 1986 S3
- LATENT DEFECTS
- LATENT DEFECTS LIABILITY
- LIABILITY
- LIMITATION ACT 1980 S14A
- NEGLIGENCE
- MURPHY V BRENTWOOD DC
- PAYNE AND OTHERS V JOHN SETCHELL LTD
- BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-LAW
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64095 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113035-1001 |
Reviews recent case law concerning whether or not a builder or consultant owes a duty of care in negligence to the subsequent purchaser of a property who suffers economic loss as a result of latent defects. Concludes that a claimant showing reasonable reliance on a certificate can succeed but that a claimant relying on a defendant's acts can only recover losses to others and their property. The negligent statements of construction professionals in such circumstances are, however, more dangerous than their negligent acts.