Omission, omission, all fall down?
Series: New Law Journal ; 151(6989) 22 June 2001, 916-917(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Considers who is liable for the remaining repairs where repairing covenants do not cover the whole property with particular reference to "Holding & Barnes Plc v Hill House Hammond Ltd", although other similar cases are also discussed. Case Law.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | X113390 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113390-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers who is liable for the remaining repairs where repairing covenants do not cover the whole property with particular reference to "Holding & Barnes Plc v Hill House Hammond Ltd", although other similar cases are also discussed. Case Law.