Professional and ordinary negligence
Series: Contract Journal ; 409(6331) 13 June 2001, 26(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Studies the decision in "JD Williams & Co v Michael Hyde and Associates", CA 6 July 2000 and the issue of the tests to be applied to establish professional negligence. The implication is that negligence may readily be found, even in circumstances where a substantial body of opinion within the profession might support the course of action taken.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | X11065 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113428-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Studies the decision in "JD Williams & Co v Michael Hyde and Associates", CA 6 July 2000 and the issue of the tests to be applied to establish professional negligence. The implication is that negligence may readily be found, even in circumstances where a substantial body of opinion within the profession might support the course of action taken.