Landlord and Tenant
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 29 EG 121 (CS)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: "Barclays Bank plc v Bee and another" CA 10 July 2001. Two S2 notices were accidentally saved simultaneoulsy by landlord (X) the first stating that an application for a new tenancy would not be opposed whilst the second opposed the application and was deemed to be invalid for failing to state the reason. A third notice opposing the application was issued. CA upheld the HC's decision that X was entitled to rely on the third notice. Tenant's Y appeal was dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3729-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113782-1001 |
"Barclays Bank plc v Bee and another" CA 10 July 2001. Two S2 notices were accidentally saved simultaneoulsy by landlord (X) the first stating that an application for a new tenancy would not be opposed whilst the second opposed the application and was deemed to be invalid for failing to state the reason. A third notice opposing the application was issued. CA upheld the HC's decision that X was entitled to rely on the third notice. Tenant's Y appeal was dismissed.