An alternative resolution
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0128) 14 July 2001, 136-137(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- COSTS
- MODEL ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE
- MODEL AGREEMENTS
- SERVICE CHARGE DISPUTES
- DELAY
- PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
- LANDLORDS
- TENANTS
- FLUOR DANIEL PROPERTIES LTD V SHORTLANDS INVESTMENTS LTD
- HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- MANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64258 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113966-1001 |
Considers whether the adjudication process could provide a quicker, cheaper and more effective process than when landlords and tenants pursue a service charge dispute through the courts. Looks at the case of "Fluor Daniel Properties Ltd v Shortlands Investments Ltd" (2001) which illustrates the problems that are encountered in resolving service charge disputes in commercial premises via the courts. Lists the various matters which would need to be included in a model adjudication agreement.